Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xdvik - An X viewer for DVI files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427667 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-14 18:00 EST ------- (In reply to comment #20) > Maybe. But I recall strange things happening with real package > names always winning against versioned virtual provides, even > when the virtual provides is higher. > Hm, ok, that looks like a bug to me. > Anyway, I have tested that without obsoletes, > rpm -Uvh xdvik-22.84.13-3.fc9.i386.rpm > doesn't uninstall xdvi and therefore doesn't proceeds because of > conflicts. > > So I guess that the Obsoletes is needed, and I think that > Obsoletes: xdvi = 22.84.12 > is the cleanest. OK, we'll go with that, simple. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
