Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bootconf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=188445 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-01-18 01:37 EST ------- It's been fifteen months since there was last activity on this ticket, and twenty months since there was last any response from the submitter. The package still builds, but it does elicit a few complaints from rpmlint and will need tweaks for system changes in the past two years: bootconf.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog - 1.0-1 Changelog needs to indicate the version. bootconf.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL The version of the GPL is required. bootconf.noarch: W: no-url-tag Please unclude a URL: tag with a pointer to the upstream web site. bootconf-gui.noarch: W: no-documentation Not a problem. bootconf-gui.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/bootconf bootconf-gui.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/security/console.apps/bootconf These are OK. bootconf-gui.noarch: E: use-old-pam-stack /etc/pam.d/bootconf (line 10) The pam_stack module isn't used these days; include should be used instead. Also, the specfile is copyrighted and points to some other file for information. But I guess that file is buried in the tarball, which is rather suboptimal. If the specfile is under GPL then please include the required GPL notice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
