Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: aspell-ml - Malayalam wordlist for GNU Aspell


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=403911


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-02-01 11:58 EST -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> Parag, that looks like a strange request to me (coming from debian 
> background).
> If the package is of good quality and people want to use it, what stops it 
> from
> being included in the repository? 
> 
> It would be definitely good for people to review other people's work but that
> should not be a condition for including this work (again the way debian does 
> it
> looks right to me).

There are multiple differences and it wouldn't be suitable to expand on all of
that in a review request but briefly, Fedora sponsors the submitter (as opposed
to just the package) and then gives commit and upload access to not only the
individual package but nearly the entire repository. So it make sense for the
proposed maintainer to demonstrate reasonable amount of understanding of
packaging guidelines. The way they demonstrate that understanding is by
reviewing other packages before getting sponsored. This process is comparatively
very light weight. 
 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to