Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: squeak-vm - Squeak virtual machine for OLPC https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247983 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-10 23:25 EST ------- please advise as to where the source code for this was originally obtained. ftp.squeak.org does not contain the same source tarball as is bundled in this package. Also note, significant portions of this package appear to be dual licensed under the LGPLv2.1+ and the Squeak license, neither of which are MIT. ./platforms/Cross/plugins/JPEGReadWriter2Plugin/jcomapi.c notes it is licensed and to read a README file, but no such file exists (contrary to the Independent JPEG Group's license). It might be considered free enough, but that's not entirely clear. There's a boatload of MP3 plugin code here. MP3 is patented. ./platforms/Cross/plugins/SoundCodecPrims/ is missing a COPYRIGHT file containing the license for code in that dir too. There's a lot of stuff under a Sun copyright with a permissive license. There's stuff under the Squeak license, not dual-licensed. There's Perl-Compatible-Regular-Expressions which is yet another license... There's GPLv2+ code in ./platforms/unix/plugins/VideoForLinuxPlugin/ccvt_types.h Debian won't carry this even in non-free. This scares me. Thanks to LaserJock for pointing out the legal mess that this code appears to be. Contining to block FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
