Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: elfutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225723 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-20 14:27 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Oh, subpackages shouldn't have a separate License: tag at all, should they? Correct, generally. > As I just said in comment#4, the -devel packages do have the correct > dependencies. The mindless rule is not sufficient to tell. Ah, I see. I misunderstood. > There is no separately published "upstream" package. The rawhide srpm is the > canonical location of the source tar file. My point was that it'd be good to have a current tarball placed at the hosted site, so that the Source0 tag could be set appropriately. Or, comment the above in the spec. Your call. Fix that and the License tags and we're set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
