Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-02-28 12:42 EST ------- Hi Wart, Here are my preliminary comments on your package : Summary is not capitalized. I like nsca-client much better than what I used. Is it really useful to suffix the packages with nagios- though ? This would clear rpmlint output from nagios-nsca.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/nsca $prog nagios-nsca.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name nsca nagios, nrpe and all are in the group Applications/System. You probably want to use the same. I don't have the BR: on libmcrypt-devel and my package build fine. Is it necessary to keep it ? I have some requires on /sbin/service and /sbin/chkconfig, taken from nrpe packages, not sure this is needed, can't find anything in the packaging guidelines. Requires(preun): /sbin/service, /sbin/chkconfig Requires(post): /sbin/chkconfig, /sbin/service Requires(postun): /sbin/service NetSaint can probably be stripped out of the description. Upstream ships an initscript (generated at build time actually) that only lacks reload, it might not worth to replace it completely. 0600 on the conf files is good. No doc in nsca-client, add %doc Changelog LEGAL README SECURITY Nothing more for today, let me know what you think. Regards, Xavier -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
