Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: grib_api - ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427121 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-02 16:29 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > This all looks good to me. I guess the bad test could be troublesome but if > you > don't have a problem with then I won't worry about it. According to upstream it is fixed, but upstream also asked me to wait for the next release to make a release. > I guess if you're not > going to need the commented-out scriptlets you could remove them so the spec > looks cleaner, but that's really minor. I am discussing adding shared libs with the debian maintainer (upstream agreed), so I'll prefer to keep them. > Which name did you think was too generic? I guess "typesizes.mod" might be, > but > I don't know how many .mod files we're going to end up seeing. Everything > else > seemed to me to be prefixed, in a subdirectory or simply named such that > conflicts would be improbable. It is because I prefixed 2 of them... .mod files should really not be generic, I hope that we end up with a lof of .mod files... Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grib_api Short Description: ECMWF encoding/decoding GRIB software Owners: pertusus Branches: InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
