Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-05 22:25 EST ------- Delay caused by work on 0.6.8 with another conversion utility. This now requires ImageMagick and gd. The libpst.spec <http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst/packages/libpst.spec> is built via ./configure (which we need to run to get 'make distcheck' anyway) from libpst.spec.in <http://www.five-ten-sg.com/libpst/packages/libpst.spec.in>. The packaging guidelines say "Every time you make changes, that is, whenever you increment the E-V-R of a package, add a changelog entry.". The version is contained in the autoconf configure.in, so when we bump that and rebuild, we automatically get a new libpst.spec with a new version number. But since we don't generally update the libpst.spec.in, that results in no change log entry in libpst.spec. Do you want us to manually add changelog entries in libpst.spec.in for every version bump in configure.in, even though the packaging is not really changing? I can see advantages to both yes and no answers. %files %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog NEWS README That caused problems, since the %doc seems to remove the documentation directory, which has already been populated by autoconf with html help files. My solution is to have autoconf also handle those GNU standard files, and then just reference %files %docdir %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version} with the documentation content fully populated by autoconf make install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
