Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: unison2.13 - File synchronization tool (compatibility package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433915 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-15 14:16 EST ------- Re: naming unison213. Yes, those rules do apply. That's unfortunate, since it makes the package name less meaningful to me, and inconsistent with other distros. Hopefully there won't be a version 21.3, because then the package names will collide. But, since these are the rules, I'll rename the package. It also states that there should be a package names plain "unison" instead of "unison227". I'm not convinced I like that idea, since that package will continually get upgraded with incompatible versions, which is what triggered adding the new packages in the first place. Would an exception be OK for the "latest" package name due to the way upstream works? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
