Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: sublib - a subtitle library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439453 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-03-29 06:05 EST ------- (In reply to comment #0) > + gacutil -i build/sublib.dll -f -package sublib -root /var/tmp/sublib-0.8-1.fc8-root-jsikorski/usr/lib64 > Failure adding assembly to the cache: Attempt to install an assembly without a strong name. Upstream didn't bother to add a keyfile for strong naming (http://www.mono-project.com/Assemblies_and_the_GAC#Assembly_Names), you can either choose to inform upstream (sign a bug) and wait for them or do it yourself. For the latter, you need to create a new keyfile with 'sn -k sublib.snk' and - this is important! - provide it as part of the SRPM (Source1) instead of creating it dynamically as the key should be common amongst all builds, no matter which architecture. Copy the resulting keyfile into sublib-0.8/src/ in %prep and patch sublib-0.8/src/SubLib/AssemblyInfo.cs to have the following line added: [assembly: AssemblyKeyFile ("sublib.snk")] Thus the assembly will be signed with the key file after the build and the gacutil command above will succeed. If upstream ever chooses to provide their own key for signing however, all builds depending on sublib must be rebuild against the version with the new key IIRC. You could also opt to send them the key you've created to circumvent this. After finishing either one of the options given, I'll continue this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
