Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubyforge - A script which automates a limited 
set of rubyforge operations


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443250


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]    |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-04-29 17:04 EST -------
Review on -2:

Good:

- rpmlint checks return:
rubygem-rubyforge.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 41, tab:
line 7)
rubygem-rubyforge.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubyforge-0.4.4/lib/rubyforge.rb 0644

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines (generic and Ruby)
- license (GPLv2+ or Ruby) OK, text not in package, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream (a955f92ebbb47953c3333c7f8428d3f168506cc4)
- package builds on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

Please fix the non-executable-script error in a new SRPM/SPEC and I will 
approve.

You may also want to advise upstream to properly license their code, only one
file seems to mention the license, and the text of the license is not included
in the Gem. This is not a blocker for Fedora inclusion.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to