Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: ocaml-pa-monad - OCaml syntax extension for monads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435299 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-12 18:53 EST ------- I don't really care one way or the other about the naming; I agree that an all-dash scheme looks cleaner but if other distros choose the other method then there could be some confusion. If that happens, a simple solution would be for this package to provide ocaml-pa_monad. Does the lack of the linking exception cause any problem for actually using this package? I don't know if syntax extensions actually get linked into the object code. I'd say this package is fine and I'd approve it, but I'd like to be clear on the license issue first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
