Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Summary: Review Request: sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [email protected],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sippy.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sippy-0-1.20080515cvs.fc9.src.rpm Description: The B2BUA is a SIP call controlling component. Unlike a SIP proxy server, which only maintains transaction state, the B2BUA maintains complete call state and participates in all call requests. For this reason it can perform number of functions that are not possible to implement using SIP proxy, such as for example accurate call accounting, pre-paid rating and billing, fail over call routing etc. Unlike PBX-type solutions such as Asterisk for example, the B2BUA doesn't perform any media relaying or processing, therefore it doesn't introduce any additional packet loss, delay or jitter into the media path. Few remarks: * This is not a B2BUA itself, but rather a library for creating ones (two examples included). * This package still not released as tarball * I'm in doubts about naming scheme. Although it looks ugly but we use python-foo naming scheme, so maybe I should rename it to python-sippy? * I placed working examples into %docs/examples (and therefore raising rpmling warnings) but maybe I must place them into %bindir or %sbindir? Every comments and suggestions will be highly appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
