Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Merge Review: redhat-lsb https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226363 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-03 21:39 EST ------- Reply to Comment #23: 1. Yes, after reconfirmation with llim, it's GPLv2. 2. I don't think it's redhat-lsb requiring its own files, redhat-lsb and lsb are 2 different packages. For example, redhat-lsb may delegate the database querying job to lsb to find out the dependencies. 3. I'd like to know why the path is intentionally hard-coded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
