Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mingw-binutils - MinGW Windows binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-10 06:15 EST ------- Can we move this package further along now? (As in, is there anything left to be discussed?) On the naming issue, I prefer mingw-binutils, and other packages can be built with the consistent naming even if they are built as subpackages (as an example, see my proposal for a GnuTLS subpackage here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg00435.html ) The reason I prefer mingw-* is that it keeps all the related packages together in rpm, yum and Bugzilla's list of components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
