Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 06:57 EST ------- for src/include/dsound.h I expect it shouldn't be ship in this release. Instead win32 users will need to download this file separely. for src/include/soundcard.h, This file explicitely prevent modification. As such we cannot allow this. But there is another soundcard.h (licensed as GPLv2 only) that can be downloaded from http://www.4front-tech.com/developer/sources/stable/ There is others license available, but I think linux support will need the GPLv2 version. So i think there is two solutions: - repack the sources with soundcard.h Gplv2 version (and remove src/include/dsound.h will be needed anyhow). - Or disable OSS support with the filed removed. Fedora doesn't use OSS anyway (only emulated from alsa), so if needed, it could be possible to have a replacement version (in _libdir/stk-oss ). My guess is that ABI compatibility will be preserved in the dependent applications (but maybe i'm wrong). For the ski,mid file, it would be fine to have the respective authors to be aware of providing a free license (Creative commons?) when they are provided within FOSS. Not all files have an Author but there is at least: ///YEM: Rights to all derivative electronic formats reserved. in projects/examples/scores/bachfugue.ski If unsure, they can still be removed... Anyway it would be nice to ask upstream for advices on each cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
