Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.




https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456774

           Summary: Review Request: libanculus-sharp - Reusable utility
                    library written in C#
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
         QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                CC: [email protected],[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Spec URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/libanculus-sharp.spec
SRPM URL: 
http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/libanculus-sharp-0.3.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

Description: 
libanculus-sharp serves and helps you to easily and quickly
write new applications. It contains all the building blocks
that you need to develop a good C# application.

rpmlint says :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint 
/home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libanculus-sharp-0.3.1-1.fc9
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] SPECS]$ rpmlint 
/home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/libanculus-sharp-*
libanculus-sharp.i386: E: no-binary
libanculus-sharp.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
libanculus-sharp-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
libanculus-sharp-doc.i386: W: no-documentation
libanculus-sharp-doc.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.

Also, I think only-non-binary-in-usr-lib and no-binary can be ignored for mono 
package

Note that mock builds are good for fedora-9-i386, fedora-9-x86_64 and 
fedora-rawhide-x86_64

It's not my first review request, but I need a sponsor.
(see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to