Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457060 Summary: Review Request: wordpress-mu - Multi-user variant of WordPress Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [email protected],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bretm/reviews/wordpress-mu/wordpress-mu.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bretm/reviews/wordpress-mu/wordpress-mu-2.6-6.fc8.src.rpm Description: WordPress-MU is a variant of WordPress that supports more than one blog per instance. It is the basis for the wordpress.com hosted service, and scales to large numbers of users and blogs. Spec file has been based upon the conventions laid-out by the existing wordpress Fedora package; please note any incorrect divergence. Source checksum should match current "latest" tarball available from upstream; upstream does not currently offer a conveniently-named version-specific tarball (http://trac.mu.wordpress.org/ticket/701). rpmlint output: ----------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/wordpress-mu.spec SPECS/wordpress-mu.spec: W: no-%build-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [EMAIL PROTECTED] rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/wordpress-mu-2.6-6.fc8.src.rpm wordpress-mu.src: W: no-%build-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The spec file doesn't have a %build section; this seems acceptable, as the application is a php web application, and doesn't have any sort of compilation step. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
