Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: honeyd-1.5c-2.src.rpm - Honeypot daemon


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456678





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-08-01 05:28 EST -------
formal review is here, please read the notes bellow

OK      source files match upstream:
            e827ada394aff91f9c539cee35e946e81152426c  arpd-0.2.tar.gz
            342cc53e8d23c84ecb91c7b66c6e93e7ed2a992a  honeyd-1.5c.tar.gz
OK      package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
BAD     specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros 
consistently.
BAD     dist tag is present.
OK      build root is correct.
BAD     license field matches the actual license.
OK      license is open source-compatible. License text included in package.
OK      latest version is being packaged.
BAD     BuildRequires are proper.
BAD     compiler flags are appropriate.
OK      %clean is present.
BAD     package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64).
??      debuginfo package looks complete.
??      rpmlint is silent.
??      final provides and requires look sane.
N/A     %check is present and all tests pass.
OK      no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK      owns the directories it creates.
OK      doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK      no duplicates in %files.
OK      file permissions are appropriate.
OK      correct scriptlets present.
OK      code, not content.
OK      documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
OK      %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK      no headers.
OK      no pkgconfig files.
OK      no libtool .la droppings.
OK      not a GUI app.

- you should standardize on using one of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
- you should add the %dist tag
- arpd is licensed under BSD, so the right license tag is "GPLv2+ and BSD"
- missing BR: readline-devel, zlib-devel
- aprd doesn't build on 64-bit platforms (it checks for libevent and libpcap
only in ${prefix}/lib and checks for static lib only)
- CFLAGS are reset to "" in configure.in

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to