Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454015 Marcela Maslanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-18 08:46:25 EDT --- - rpmlint checks return: tcl-tile-devel.i386: W: no-documentation but that's ok. Devel don't have to own some documentation. - package meets naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license: Please check the license: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/TCL The source code is from tcl developers and it looks more tclish to me than MIT. - spec file legible, in am. english - probably OK - source matches upstream OK - package compiles on devel (x86) - check this latter - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales OK - not relocatable OK - owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files OK - permissions ok OK - %clean OK - macro use consistent OK - docs OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime OK - devel package OK - no .la files OK - post/postun ldconfig no, OK - devel requires base package n-v-r OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
