Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-26 13:22:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The only drawback I can see here is that after removing "elisa", the plugins > will be gone, but not the "elisa-common" package. The only solution I can > think > of would be to duplicate the files currently in "elisa-common" in "elisa" and > rename the "common" to "devel". We'd have two packages nearly identical, with > one used only for building the plugins. I was about to suggest combining elisa with elisa-plugins-good, but if the GUI itself is in elisa-plugins-bad... How about making the %postun of elisa be 'rpm -e elisa-common' ? Not that it is that big of a deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
