Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460287 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-29 12:29:27 EDT --- For 1.6-1: * License - As far as I checked the codes, the license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * The place of %description - Similar to bug 460289, please fix the place of %description * %prep stage ------------------------------------------------------ %__unzip src.zip ------------------------------------------------------ - Move this to %prep (to make happy with --short-circuit) ? Symlinking - Similar to bug 460289, would you explain why you want to add version to jar files' names? * Duplicate files - "license.txt" for -javadoc subpackge is redundant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
