Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448337 Pavel Shevchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | --- Comment #12 from Pavel Shevchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-31 18:26:10 EDT --- Sorry for huge delay =( * Sat Aug 30 2008 Pavel "Stalwart" Shevchuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - 0.16.999.043-3 - One more directory ownership fix - Backported enlightenment.pc.in from trunk - Strip unneeded config.h include from e.h Spec: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/9/i386/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3/enlightenment.spec SRPM: http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/9/i386/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3/enlightenment-0.16.999.043-3.fc9.src.rpm YUM repository for f9, i386 and x86_64: [scwlab-f-e17] name=Stalwart Fedora - E17 baseurl=http://rpm.scwlab.com/fedora/e17/$releasever/$basearch gpgcheck=0 enabled=1 ------- I hacked up patch for config.h just to realize that config.h isn't actually needed to build stuff that depends on e17. =( So i just strip config.h out of e.h now. I'm not sure deriving from upstream enlightenment-config is really needed, so i didn't in -3. If you insist, i could do -4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
