Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-03 12:18:28 EDT --- Sorry to bother you again, but, please, provide more explanations - it still not clear for some people, whether iLBC legal or not. Opal ships this implementation of RFC3951 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3951 ), which distributes under very strange license: http://www.ilbcfreeware.org/documentation/gips_iLBClicense.pdf See also this thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/90195 We already removed iLBC support from Asterisk - can we re-add this support back? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
