Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461404 Fabian Affolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-07 08:59:54 EDT --- This is only an informal review. RPM Lint: ok Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: ok Actual License: ok %doc License: ok Spec file language: english Spec file readable: ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: - Applicable Package Guidelines: Locales: ok Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: n/a Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: ok %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: ok Static Libraries in -static package: ok pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
