Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462523 --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-17 01:23:46 EDT --- * Package named according to naming guidelines * spec named according to naming guidelines * Package is MIT licensed * Spec is legible American English * tarball matches upstream * No locale files * Not a shared library * Not relocatable * Package builds on i386 * Package owns all directories that it creates and none another package creates * No duplicate files * Permissions in files set properly * Macros used consistently * code not content * Not a GUI app * Proper %install and %clean * Proper UTF-8/ASCii encoding all around. * No scriptlets x You should query upstream to include a separate LICENSE file in the tarball * Builds in mock rpmlint: python-prioritized-methods.noarch: W: no-documentation No documentation exists in the upstream tarball so this is ignorable. Also note, this package depends on a bunch of python-peak-* packages which are built in koji but not submitted for updates in bodhi. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
