Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464190 --- Comment #4 from Tim Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-28 08:39:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > What is not nice is that you have > not modified the name of the tarball, so people who have downloaded the file > in > the past and those who would download it now would not know that there is a > difference between the two versions. Sorry! Actually the mistake was in the source RPM: I accidentally used an mis-labelled tarball that was not for release. Thanks for spotting it. I've fixed the spec file to add the vendor tag now, and replaced the correct 0.0.2 release tarball into the source RPM. Spec URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/expendable/expendable.spec SRPM URL: http://twaugh.fedorapeople.org/expendable/expendable-0.0.2-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
