Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226480 --- Comment #20 from Marcela Maslanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-29 07:42:28 EDT --- > Among the man pages, CmdWrite, Handles and CmdWrite seems to be > part of tcl documentation and not tclx. True. These pages were excluded. > It seems to me that TclXInit.3 and Keylist.3 should be in the devel > package, since they are associated with the C interface. Moved into devel package. > Also TclXInit.3 is partly wrong because doing -ltclx won't work, > one needs to use -L /usr/lib/tcl8.5/tclx8.4/ -ltclx8.4. However > one could imagine that users wanting to use tclx like that > know that the object is in general dlopened and so that they have to find > the library in the tcl paths. > It may be possible to have in devel > %{_librir}/libtcl.so -> /usr/lib/tcl8.5/tclx8.4/libtclx8.4.so > and ship an /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ file to add the path to ldconfig. > However I think that it would be wrong since there is no soname. This package hadn't new release for long time and I don't think it's needed to do some bigger changes. > I'd still like to know more precisely why utf-8 locale needed > to avoid truncating help files. I'm also curious why. I removed it, 'cause I didn't find the reason. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/tclx/tclx-8.4.0-12.fc10.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/tclx/tclx.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
