Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #4 from Göran Uddeborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-29 11:38:11 EDT --- Maybe you misunderstood my question in comment 2 slightly. I wasn't asking about HOW to do things. (I've done many RPM packages. This is just the first I try to get into Fedora.) My question was if the important part was to have these files marked %doc, or to have them placed in %_defaultdocdir. I mean, not only %defaultdocdir files are marked %doc. But reading a bit between the lines here I take it you would prefer to have those files actually placed under %_defaultdocdir. So I've implemented these changes. Spec URL: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ttf2pt1/ttf2pt1.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ttf2pt1/ttf2pt1-3.4.4-4.src.rpm Rpmlint warnings actually increased with this change. It doesn't complain about development files in a non-development package any more. But instead it complains about executable files among the documentation files. Not all the example code is C code, but some is perl. Rpmlint also complains about the dependencies these perl scripts in the documentation directory have on perl modules. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
