Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285 Marcela Maslanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #11 from Marcela Maslanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-30 04:10:22 EDT --- check release numbers here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease - package meets naming guidelines OK - package meets packaging guidelines OK - license (same as Perl) OK, text in %doc, matches source OK - spec file legible, in am. english OK - source matches upstream FAIL -> source at upstream is in tar.gz format - package compiles on devel (x86) OK - no missing BR OK - no unnecessary BR FAIL - not relocatable OK - owns all directories that it creates OK - no duplicate files OK - permissions ok OK - %clean ok OK - macro use consistent OK - no need for -docs OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime OK - no need for .desktop file OK Please fix the source and useless dependency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
