Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464621 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Habkost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-30 14:45:32 EDT --- Updated with the EXTRA_FLAGS change. I've not set EXTRA_FLAGS on x86_64 because it breaks the building of 32-bits binaries. We could simply use the prebuilt binaries on x86_64 also, but I think prebuilt binaries are worse than the hack to build 32-bit binaries on x86_64. But prebuilt binaries can be enabled on x86_64 by simply removing x86_64 from the definition of %{real_build_arches}, if desired. http://ehabkost.fedorapeople.org/etherboot-5.4.4-3.fc10.src.rpm http://ehabkost.fedorapeople.org/etherboot.spec http://ehabkost.fedorapeople.org/etherboot.spec.diff http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=852829 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
