Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 --- Comment #23 from Michal Jaegermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-03 18:59:18 EDT --- > Regarding the emacs subpackages, my intuition is that with only > the el package, it just doeosn't work. You really do not need .elc packages with emacs at all. This is only an "optimization" to load things faster and with nowadays CPUs negligible one (this was not the case at emacs beginnings). There was also "undumping" which ceased to be feasible. Moreover I know of cases when a presence of .elc packages really break things, causing some functions to bail out with complaints about wrong parameters, while removal of those and leaving only .el files provides a fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
