Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438608 Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #13 from Michael Schwendt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-07 10:57:09 EDT --- * The original elisa-common split was fine, IMO. No need to duplicate files. And no need to add a virtual elisa-devel. We have tools in non-devel packages that are BuildRequires. elisa-common can be BR, too. * The %description could explain briefly what "good set of plugins" means and why it matters. * 0.5.13 is available. Packaging-wise this is fine. Could be imported and developed further in cvs until the deps are ready, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
