Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-10 20:04:41 EDT --- > I can't see why you don't use the initial Makefile. The initial Makefile seemed horribly broken enough to warrant replacement (-m32 among other things!). If it builds using correct Fedora flags with make like you suggest I don't see any problem using the original Makefile though. > openssl in requires is not useful, it is automatically found by rpm. Ok. > It is better to avoid using Fedora whenever possible, so please rename > README.Fedora to something more neutral like README.Dist > cp should be cp -p to keep timestamp. > Also I suggest using %{_mandir}/man8/%{name}.8* to catch any kind of > compression. Ok. > I am afraid that, if accepted, you'll need contact legal (through spot, > he is the contact) because of the crypto and export stuff. I'll contact him. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
