Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467175 --- Comment #7 from Gerd Hoffmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-22 05:48:24 EDT --- Answer from Sam Vilain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: AFAIK the original author has not responded to requests for relicensing under GPLv2. Which is odd, given that another of their projects, Tangram was *only* available under the GPL, and it *required* Set::Object. Hmm.. Could get a notary public to serve them notice of the intention to relicense Set::Object as GPL under the requirements of the license for Tangram. If they don't make claim, then it should be able to be relicensed, I'd guess. Cheers, Sam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
