Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #16 from Robin Norwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-23 11:38:41 EDT --- As far as item #2 in comment #14 goes, I think the standard practice for things like sample code is to make it non-executable and mark it as documentation. If you want to I can make this change for cerebroui when we resubmit cerebro. For item #3, yes, the license tag was set to GPLv3+ because of demjson.py - I think the license tag is correct. Since that file is GPLv3+, we can distribute cerebro as GPLv3+, but not as GPLv2+. The 'more restrictive' (GPLv3+) license wins. As a matter of clarity, the LICENSE file should probably be changed to match GPLv3+, but I don't think that's usually required to pass package review. I could be mistaken, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
