Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435015 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-10-24 14:15:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Umm.. I cannot guess why you want to name binary rpm names as > > libgpp4 and libgpp4-devel. Simply gpp4 and gpp4-devel is better. > > He's done that for mmdb as well; I had thought that eventually I would > understand the reason for it but I haven't figured it out yet. I guess Tim will reply in a few days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
