Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597


Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review+              |fedora-review?




--- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-10-26 23:14:09 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904080&name=build.log uses
> the tgz to build the gem and then install the gem, but has left-over .o files
> installed
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=904141&name=build.log is 
> the
> next attempt and cleans out those .o files, but the ext/ferret_ext.so.debug
> file makes the rpm build bork nonetheless. This is one of the main reasons why
> I couldn't find a way to use or build and then use the gem itself.

Sorry, however other maintainer handles this. Please fix this.
Example A (my case)
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-zoom/devel/rubygem-zoom.spec?view=co

Example B (spec file by sseago)
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-mongrel/devel/rubygem-mongrel.spec?view=co(In
reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > (In reply to comment #12)
> > > I found GPLv2+ too in ext/q_parser.c. Pending other comments, I'll push 
> > > these
> > > changes when we're done.
> > Please also check Bison exception mentioned in the file.
> 
> The Bison exception is a "may remove (at your option)" which I'm not sure 
> makes
> sense; how should I note this in the RPM License tag if it should be included
> in the RPM License tag?

Simply use "License: MIT and BSD".

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to