Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454408 Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-03 03:50:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > > Finally, I would have approved this package, if it wasn't providing this: > > mingw32-binutils(x86-64) = 2.18.50_20080109_2-8.fc10 > > > > What is this meant to mean? IMO, it's meaningless. > > It's added automatically as far as I'm aware. In this package > we don't override RPM's normal dependency generation. Yes, I meanwhile also noticed. It's FC10's rpm adding more rpm-database bloat and redundancy. IMO, the rpm devs are outsmarting itselves. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
