Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469972 --- Comment #2 from David Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-08 09:05:10 EDT --- bad rpmlint output: glfw.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/glfw-2.6/glfwug.tex glfw.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/glfw-2.6/glfwrm.tex glfw.x86_64: E: no-binary (if it has no binary wouldn't libglfw be a better name - also documentation goes in the documentation package) glfw-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package (see below) glfw-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libglfw.so glfw-devel.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libglfw.so glfw.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 9) according to http://glfw.sourceforge.net/license.html license is zlib/libpng not bsd and as usual a few comments on your voodoo is nice for those who maintain your packages while you are unable. You should split out all the documentation into a subpackage or at the very least put it in the -devel package (though there seems to be a lot of it, a doc package would be preferable) Good news though, it builds in mock (x86_64 f10) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
