Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #13 from Ondrej Vasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-13 08:53:29 EDT --- Yes, they have links v1.00 package, but links v1.00 package doesn't have graphic, so it could fully replace elinks - so I'll be completely ok to remove symlinks to links for hypothetical links v1.00 package if accepted on fedora-devel-list (although the output could differ a bit in some cases), but not for links v2.X package with graphics ... I really would prefer to use links2 binary name for links with graphic as it is used on other distros that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
