Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085


Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
         AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]    |[EMAIL PROTECTED]
              Alias|                            |perl-HTML-Tiny
               Flag|                            |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  2008-11-18 23:01:19 EDT ---
There is an examples/ directory; why not include it in %doc?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939263

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test
passes cleanly.

ce178f7dabb15930512fdbfe21d4edcb  HTML-Tiny-1.03.tar.gz
ce178f7dabb15930512fdbfe21d4edcb  HTML-Tiny-1.03.tar.gz.srpm

=====> perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm <=====
====> rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
====> provides for perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(HTML::Tiny) = 1.03
perl-HTML-Tiny = 1.03-1.fc9
====> requires for perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
perl(Carp)  
perl(strict)  
perl(vars)  

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

Reply via email to