Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955 Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-25 11:15:53 EDT --- Here is what rpmlint says on the rpms: fprintd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/fprintd.conf You said you wanted to make this conf ? fprintd.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/net.reactivated.Fprint.conf This is ignorable fprintd-devel.i386: W: summary-not-capitalized fprintd development documentation I always use a more-or-less standardized summary of "Development files for %{name}" for -devel packages. fprintd-devel.i386: W: invalid-license GFDLv1.1+ No + there, I think. printd-pam.i386: W: no-documentation Thats sad, but ignorable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
