Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-26 04:36:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Why not name the package TinyCC or tinycc? Sounds reasonable to me. What the actual executable called (Pardon, but I haven't looked into the actual package yet)? It had been "tcc" for TurboC. So if that also applies to TinyCC, this would be problematic, too. IIRC (It's been many years since I used it) tcc also internally had used defines name __TCC__ etc. It would be technically very problematic, if TinyCC was doing the same, because such defines would likely clash with TurboC defines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
