Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458054 Stefan Ruppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #17 from Stefan Ruppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-26 15:11:36 EDT --- I stumbled over this Review Request and I'm happy to see that the arm4.org ARM is in process to be included into Red Hat distribution. Just a comment about static libraries. I do not think a static library should be build. ARM is designed as a dynamic library which can be linked to an application implicitly by using -larm4 during link time. But the main usage is to dlopen() the libarm4.so. Just like the Apache mod_arm4 does. See section "1.7 Linking to an ARM Implementation" of the standard documents for ARM 4.0 or ARM 4.1! I don't know the Red Hat policies for libraries. But we should not encourage users of ARM to link statically! Any comments? Regards, Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
