Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464074 --- Comment #44 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-11-29 04:42:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > I haven't seen discussed why upstream only provides a static library instead > of > a Shared Object ? Some people still prefer static libraries. > Which Package will use this one (does a runtime test was done) ? All the examples have been run. > There is no needs to export CFLAGS before the %configure macro (as already > done > within the %configure). Agreed, but this is just redundant. > Headers got installed in /usr/include which is the standard path. Does someone > checked if there is possible namespace issue ? All the identifiers in the includes have prefixes, such as dd_ , ddd_ , ddf_ Very unlike they will conflict with anything else. > Also, headers should have been installed using install -p to prevent > timestramp > changes. > What headers? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
