Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459210 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-12-10 15:44:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > At the first glance, the license should be LGPL v2. This is specified both in > [most of ] the source files and in the README file. What is the reasoning > behind using GPLv3+ in the spec ? The tools should be licensed under the GPL instead of the LGPL for the libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
