Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476247 Jesse Keating <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?([email protected] | |m) --- Comment #4 from Jesse Keating <[email protected]> 2008-12-12 19:13:33 EDT --- You're still missing the LICENSE.txt file mentioned in the header for the src/snprintf.c file, as well as adding the license itself to the License: field in the spec. Also curious if the patches have been submitted upstream (or if they're suitable for upstream). Only the -devel subpackage should Require pkgconfig since that's where the .pc file is shipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
