Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475410 Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> 2008-12-14 20:10:43 EDT --- Right, SAGE just puts the headers into /usr/include/symmetrica and builds the sources into a libsymmetrica.a. We want to do the same so we can link SAGE against it (and that's what the specfile does). The lack of a Makefile sucks, but I don't see it as a blocker, as the instructions to build it are fairly simple. The license mentioned in the specfile is actually MIT, not BSD. That's pretty close to public domain. Either way, the license is definitely acceptable for Fedora, it matters only for the text to write into the License tag. I'd suggest just going with License: MIT. Making something truely public domain isn't allowed under German copyright law (Urheberrechtsgesetz), which I assume is why the MIT X11 license was used instead. But of course clarification can't hurt if we can get it. As for the warnings, I can try to fix them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list [email protected] http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
