Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #6 from Michal Nowak <mno...@redhat.com> 2008-12-23 07:23:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Is there any explanation of why the existing fltk package can't just be > updated? * FLTK2 - is unstable, fast moving target - long way to stabilization - come concerns on its future, because of FLTK1.3 line now having some FLTK2 features and is considered being merge of FLTK1+2 * FLTK1 - only bug-fixes - stable API Upgrading FLTK to version 2 means breakage of API/ABI and also regressions: """ However, the momentum of the FLTK-1.1.x development meant that there are many bug-fixes in 1.1.x that are not available in 2.0. """ see: http://fltk.org/articles.php?L825+I0+TFAQ+P1+Q -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
